WEEKLY WATER NEWS

DATASTREME WES WEEK THREE: 20-24 September 2004


Water in the News


Reports from the Field -- Faye McCollum, WES LIT Leader from Columbus, GA reported on the hectic weather associated with the remnants of Hurricane Ivan as it traveled across Alabama and western Georgia. She said that in the Columbus area, almost 4 inches of rain fell and winds approached 50 mph, resulting in the downing of many power lines trees and branches. Numerous tornadoes that were spawned by Ivan caused people to take cover frequently. She noted that they had just cleaned up after the remnants of Hurricane Frances had battered the region. However, the sun finally came out.


Concept of the Week: Great Lakes Water Levels

In recent years, Great Lakes water levels declined significantly to near historic lows. Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, and Erie experienced their lowest water levels in 35 years with serious implications for lake-based activities. Over the past year or so, however, changes in weather conditions in the Great Lakes watershed appear to have somewhat reversed the decline in water levels.

From 1997 to 2001, Lakes Michigan and Huron dropped by 104 cm (40.8 in.) and Lake Erie dropped by 96 cm (37.6 in.), encompassing the greatest three-year drop in lake levels since continuous records began in 1860. This dramatic decline in lake level was due to a combination of weather conditions in the Great Lakes watershed. Rainfall, snowfall, and air temperature during winter and spring govern water levels of the Great Lakes in spring and summer. Spring melting of the winter snow pack in the watershed is an important contributing factor as is air temperature that ultimately governs evaporation rates. During 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000, lower than normal precipitation and higher than normal temperatures reduced the winter snow pack, decreased discharge on rivers flowing into the lakes, and accelerated lake evaporation. Although input of water into the Great Lakes was above the long-term average in Fall 2001, lake levels remained well below average because of less than the usual snow melt in the Spring of 2001 and less than normal winter ice-cover in 2001-02. (More open water translates into greater winter evaporation.)

Great Lakes water levels showed signs of recovery during 2002, but in early 2003, all the lakes were lower than the long-term average for that time of year. A cool wet summer in the eastern Lakes region, but dry summer weather across the west meant that lake levels for the upper lakes continued to remain below average, while the lower lakes had levels that returned to near average. The cool summer of 2004 was very similar to 2003, with below average precipitation across the western Lakes and above average rainfall over the eastern Lakes. By mid September 2004, Lakes Erie and Ontario had water levels that were above the long-term monthly average (0.11 m or 4 inches and 0.20 m or 8 inches, respectively). Following below average levels for the winter and spring, Lake Superior returned to average by early September. Although the water level for Lakes Michigan and Huron had increased above the level of one year ago, it remained approximately 30 cm (12 inches) below the long-term average. (The Straits of Mackinac that link Lakes Michigan and Huron are so wide and deep that the levels of these two lakes are essentially the same.)

Low lake levels adversely impact commercial navigation, marinas, recreational boaters, and electric power facilities. Shallower than usual water requires expensive and environmentally damaging dredging to keep shipping channels navigable and ports open. Even with more dredging, some channels cannot accommodate the draft of heavily laden freighters. Reduced carrying capacity impedes transport of grain, coal, ore, and other raw materials to processing facilities and markets. In 2000, Lake Carriers transported 5% to 8% less cargo, sending prices higher. If storm winds cause near-shore water levels to fall, marinas, docks, and boat ramps may be temporarily inaccessible. The Great Lakes supply most of the potable water for communities and cooling water for coal-fired and nuclear electric power plants located along their shores. A drop in water level may require costly repositioning of intake pipes. On the positive side, lower lake levels translate into broader beaches and wetland habitats and less shoreline erosion.

For more information on past, current, and anticipated Great Lakes water levels, go to http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/now/wlevels/, a web page maintained by the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL). Records of Great Lakes water levels constitute one of the longest high quality hydrometeorological data sets in North America, dating back to about 1860. Lake level measurements are collected and archived by NOAA's National Ocean Service.

Concept of the Week: Questions

  1. With rising temperatures, the rate of evaporation of water [(increases)(decreases)].
  2. A trend toward snowier and colder winters and springs is likely to cause levels of the Great Lakes to [(rise)(fall)].


Historical Events


Return to WES Homepage

URL: WES:/news.html
Prepared by AMS WES Central Staff and Edward J. Hopkins, Ph.D., email
hopkins@meteor.wisc.edu
© Copyright, 2004, The American Meteorological Society.